Bermuda’s Role as a Tax Haven: The “Sink OFC” Label and the Impact of TCJA
Bermuda, a British Overseas Territory located in the Atlantic Ocean, has long been recognized for its role in tax evasion schemes, particularly those involving base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). The island nation is often referred to as a “Bermuda black hole” due to its use in US corporations’ tax avoidance strategies.
Definition
The term “Bermuda black hole” refers to tax evasion schemes where untaxed profits from US corporations are routed to Bermuda, a tax haven. This practice allows the profits to avoid US corporation tax. From 2004 to 2017, US corporations amassed over $1 trillion in offshore locations, with Bermuda serving as the preferred final destination for a significant fraction of these profits [1][2][3][4]. Notably, Apple and Google used the “Bermuda black hole” as part of their Double Irish arrangement tax structure [5][6][7][8][9][10][11].
Replacing the Term
A 2017 academic study published in Nature magazine introduced a new term, “Sink offshore financial centre” (Sink OFC), to describe jurisdictions like Bermuda, where a disproportionate amount of value disappears from the economic system [17]. According to the study, Bermuda ranked as the 5th largest of 24 Sink OFCs identified and classified [17]. The study highlighted how these Sink OFCs rely on Conduit OFCs, such as the Netherlands or Ireland, to route untaxed profits to the Sink OFCs [17].
Impact of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) of 2017
Since the TCJA, tax academics argue that US corporations’ ability to use offshore structures to shield untaxed profits from US taxation, such as “Bermuda black holes,” has significantly declined [18]. The TCJA mandates that global US corporate income is now considered automatically repatriated to the US, diminishing the incentive for corporations to utilize tax havens like Bermuda for profit shifting. Consequently, the term “Bermuda black hole” may no longer remain in common use.
References
- [1] Nassim Khadem, “Apple, Google, Microsoft cop tax audit,” Sydney Morning Herald, 10 April 2015, https://www.smh.com.au/business/companies/apple-google-microsoft-cop-tax-audit-20150410-1mj0rm.html
- [2] McKinsey & Company, “The real story behind US companies’ offshore cash reserves,” June 2017, https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/strategy-and-corporate-finance/our-insights/the-real-story-behind-us-companies-offshore-cash-reserves
- [3] Saleem Shah, “Offshoring Money: A Threat to Democracy,” Daily Times, 3 May 2016, https://dailytimes.com.pk/354371/offshoring-money-a-threat-to-democracy/
- [4] David Greene, “Avoidance or Evasion?,” New Law Journal, 14 April 2016, https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/content/avoidance-or-evasion
- [5] Irish Times, “Apple’s cash mountain, how it avoids tax, and the Irish link,” 6 November 2017, https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/apple-s-cash-mountain-how-it-avoids-tax-and-the-irish-link-1.3226903
- [6] New York Times, “After a Tax Crackdown, Apple Found a New Shelter for Its Profits,” 6 November 2017, https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/06/technology/apple-taxes-ireland.html
- [7] Irish Times, “‘Double Irish’ and ‘Dutch Sandwich’ saved Google $3.7bn in tax in 2016,” 2 January 2018, https://www.irishtimes.com/business/technology/google-s-double-irish-dutch-sandwich-saved-it-3-7bn-in-tax-in-2016-1.3219738
- [8] Bloomberg, “Google’s ‘Dutch Sandwich’ Shielded 16 Billion Euros From Tax,” 2 January 2018, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-01-02/google-s-dutch-sandwich-shielded-16-billion-euros-from-tax
- [9] Financial Times, “‘Double Irish’ limits Facebook’s tax bill to €1.9m in Ireland,” 5 December 2013, https://www.ft.com/content/39e7a81a-54b3-11e3-bcda-00144feab49a
- [10] Irish Independent, “Facebook paid just €30m tax in Ireland despite earning €12bn,” 29 November 2017, https://www.independent.ie/business/irish/facebook-paid-just-30m-tax-in-ireland-despite-earning-12bn-36197879.html
- [11] Business Week, “The Tax Haven That’s Saving Google Billions,” 18 January 2010, http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/05_36/b4118717479723.htm
- [12] US Senate, “Offshore Profit Shifting and the U.S. Tax Code - Part 2 (Apple Inc.),” 21 May 2013, https://www.appropriations.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/Apple_Supplemental_Report_5-21-13.pdf
- [13] EU Commission, “COMMISSION DECISION of 30.8.2016 on STATE AID SA. 38373 (2014/C) (ex 2014/NN) (ex 2014/CP) implemented by Ireland to Apple,” 30 August 2016, https://ec.europa.eu/competition/state_aid/cases/38373_14_155_2014.pdf
- [14] New Yorker, “How Apple Helped Create Ireland’s Economies, Real and Fantastical,” 31 August 2016, https://www.newyorker.com/business/currency/how-apple-helped-create-irelands-economies-real-and-fantastical
- [15] RECOVERING ILLICIT ASSETS OFFSHORE: DEMYSTIFYING THE BLACK HOLE, KRyS Global, June 2016, https://www.krysglobal.com/assets/pdfs/KRyS_DEMYSTIFYING_THE_BLACK_HOLE_-_How_Tax_Evasion_Schemes_Function_in_Offshore_Centers.pdf
- [16] The Governance of the Black Holes of the World Economy: Shadow Banking and Offshore Finance, City University, London, June 2013, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/54553874_The_Governance_of_the_Black_Holes_of_the_World_Economy_Shadow_Banking_and_Offshore_Finance
- [17] Garcia-Bernardo, Javier; Fichtner, Jan; Takes, Frank W.; Heemskerk, Eelke M., “Uncovering Offshore Financial Centers: Conduits and Sinks in the Global Corporate Ownership Network,” Scientific Reports, 2017, https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-017-06322-9
- [18] Harvard Business Review, “Breaking Down the New U.S. Corporate Tax Law,” 26 December 2017, https://hbr.org/2017/12/breaking-down-the-new-u-s-corporate-tax-law