Here is the rewritten article in markdown format:

Challenges in Suspicious Activity Reporting

==============================================

Suspicious activity reporting (SAR) plays a crucial role in financial crime risk management, but various challenges hinder its effectiveness. Here are some key points related to these challenges:

Inconsistent Legal Frameworks

Inconsistent legal frameworks for data protection hinder effective intelligence-led approaches.
The current system penalizes “failure to report” but does not sanction overreporting, leading to defensive reporting postures.

Volume-Driven SAR Challenges

A low threshold for suspicion and an all-crimes approach drive up SAR volumes without improving quality or outcomes.
High volumes of low-value reporting consume resources, creating risks for innocent parties.

Opportunities for Reform

To address the challenges in SAR, policymakers can consider the following opportunities for reform:

Focusing on Quality Reporting

Reformation of SAR mechanisms to focus on higher-quality reporting and effectiveness in the financial crime framework.
Prioritization of feedback, information sharing, and prioritization between public and private sectors to support accurate identification of suspicion.

Geographical Targeting Orders (GTOs)

Use of GTOs to set points of integration of funds and efforts.

Global Cooperation

Effective SAR requires international cooperation. Here are some key aspects of global cooperation:

Encouragement of international information sharing, including the sharing of SARs, to combat multinational crimes.
Intra-group sharing supported by guidance at national levels to facilitate group-wide filing and understanding of comprehensive intelligence pictures.

Conclusion

To address these challenges and opportunities for reform, policymakers are encouraged to take proactive steps to work with public and private sector stakeholders to identify areas for enhancement in their jurisdictions.