Financial Crime World

Monaco’s AML System under Scrutiny: EU watchdog warns of “name-and-shame” threat

EU’s concerns over Monaco’s AML/CFT framework

The European Union’s Anti-Money Laundering (AML) watchdog, Europol’s European Money Laundering Authority (EMLA), has criticized Monaco’s AML/CFT framework, raising concerns over the risk of reputational damage through the EU’s “name-and-shame” mechanism.

Subhead: European Union’s assessment of Monaco’s AML/CFT framework

  • The EUFIU report expresses serious concerns over Monaco’s AML/CFT framework
  • Monaco’s system poses a potential risk to the EU’s financial security
  • Monaco could face reputational damage as a result of the EU’s “name-and-shame” mechanism

Monaco under the radar for money laundering activities

Monaco, known for its glamorous lifestyle and offshore financial services, has long been under the radar for money laundering activities.

Subhead: History of Monaco’s assessment

  • Monaco has been subject to increased scrutiny by Moneyval since 2011
  • Following a 2018 assessment, critical areas of concern were identified
  • Lack of adequate risk assessment of businesses and professionals

Challenges and recommendations

The report highlights Monaco’s limited resources and lack of an independent regulatory body as key challenges.

Subhead: Addressing the challenges

  • Strengthening cooperation between Monaco’s financial intelligence unit and European counterparts
  • Improving information sharing and coordination

Reputational risk and potential consequences

The EU’s “name-and-shame” mechanism entails publicly disclosing jurisdictions with inadequate AML/CFT frameworks. Monaco is currently rated as a “low” risk jurisdiction, but there are concerns that the EUFIU report could lead to an unfavorable outcome.

Subhead: Impact of the rating

  • Monaco may face reputational damage and decreased attractiveness to international investors
  • Ongoing global push to strengthen AML/CFT frameworks
  • Monaco must address the concerns and invest in significant changes to meet evolving regulatory demands