Committee Delivers Verdict on FICAC’s Performance

A Standing Committee on Justice, Law and Human Rights has completed its review of the Fiji Independent Commission Against Corruption (FICAC) annual reports, providing insight into various aspects of the institution’s operations.

Review Highlights

The committee sought clarification on several procedures and practices employed by FICAC, including:

• Handling cases with insufficient evidence
• The “Good Kiddo” program
• Financial reporting

The findings are contained in a report presented to Parliament yesterday.

Key Issues

Naming of Cases

FICAC explained that some cases involve anonymous complaints, which are still investigated regardless of whether names are provided or not. This approach ensures that all complaints receive due attention, even if the identity of the complainant remains unknown.

Closing Cases with Insufficient Evidence

FICAC officials revealed that after conducting investigations and assessments by its legal department, a decision is made to close cases where there is no sufficient evidence to proceed.

Recommendations

The committee recommended:

• Developing homegrown programs tailored to Fiji’s unique cultural, family, and religious setup for the Good Kiddo program
• Additional funds and resources for FICAC’s Northern and Western offices
• Substantively filling the position of Commissioner, which has been vacant since the commission’s establishment

Positive Aspects

The committee praised FICAC’s efforts in promoting gender equality, noting that three female staff members hold managerial positions within the organization. The report recommends that FICAC continue to maintain a balance between male and female employment and promotion.

Next Steps

The committee’s findings and recommendations are now before Parliament for consideration.

Note: I used Markdown syntax to format the article with headings (##), subheadings (#), bullet points (*), and bold text (**). Let me know if you’d like me to make any changes!