Corruption in Kyrgyzstan: A Comprehensive Report

Introduction

Kyrgyzstan’s fight against corruption is an ongoing effort that requires a multifaceted approach. Despite progress made in addressing this issue, much work remains to be done to strengthen institutions, improve legal frameworks, and enhance enforcement mechanisms.

Judicial Reforms

Extensive judicial reforms began in 2011 with the aim of overhauling the country’s judiciary system. However, it is too early to assess how these regulations will be applied in practice.

Improving the Business Environment

The government has launched a series of reforms aimed at simplifying procedures and reducing the number of licenses and permits required for businesses to operate. The restructuring of agencies also aims to create a more favorable business environment.

Energy Sector Transparency Initiative (FESTI)

Launched in June 2011, FESTI is an initiative designed to increase transparency and accountability within the energy sector.

Adhering to International Conventions

Kyrgyzstan ratified the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) in 2005 but still requires improvement of its legal framework to be fully compliant with international standards.

National Legislation

The country’s anti-corruption laws are weak and lack proper enforcement mechanisms, including provisions for liability of legal entities for corruption, commercial bribery, and foreign bribery.

Asset Declaration

Civil servants are required to disclose their assets; however, the system is complex and appears ineffective in preventing conflicts of interest or identifying illicit enrichment.

Election Financing Regulations

The adoption of the Constitutional Law on Elections in 2011 improved political party financing regulations. However, a new law on political parties and clearer rules on financing would benefit the country.

Public Procurement

The law on public procurement has been amended several times to prohibit breaking up tenders into parts, establish clear criteria for excluding bidders, and standardize tender documents. Nevertheless, implementation is hampered by weak institutional capacities.

Conclusion

While Kyrgyzstan has made progress in addressing corruption, more work needs to be done to strengthen institutions, improve legal frameworks, and enhance enforcement mechanisms to effectively combat corruption.