Title: Georgia’s War on WIC Fraud: The Advanced Quantitative Analysis behind Georgia’s Fraud Detection and Prevention System
Date: December 13, 2016
Speaker
- Chavis Paulk, MPA
Event
- Nutrition Services Directors Meeting
Location
- Georgia WIC Program (GAWIC)
Georgia’s Fight Against WIC Fraud
Advance Fraud Detection and Prevention System (FDPS)
With the fifth largest WIC Program in the US, serving approximately 250,299 participants in FY2016, and a cumulative food cost of $91.5 million, even a small degree of fraud can result in significant financial losses. To combat fraud, GAWIC has established an advanced Fraud Detection and Prevention System (FDPS).
Objectives of FDPS
- Combat fraud through quantitative analysis
- Collaborate with border states
GAWIC by the Numbers
- Approximately 250,299 participants
- Cumulative food cost: $91.5 million
- Participant investigations for FFY 2015: 0.090% of Georgia WIC participants
- Demographics:
- 62% White
- 38% Black or African American
- 7% Hispanic or Latino
- 3% Other
- Female participants: 62%
- Male participants: 38%
Collaborative Initiatives
Several local health districts, the Georgia Department of Public Health, Emory University, and border states (Tennessee, Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, and North Carolina) have joined forces in the fight against fraud.
Fraud Detection Methods
Focus Groups
The current and proposed fraud detection methods will be evaluated through a series of focus groups. In these focus groups, methods, both existing and new, will be assessed based on their effectiveness. Methods of detecting participant fraud, such as reviewing existing tools and systems, will also be examined.
Analytical Models and Data Collection Techniques
The FDPS relies on analytical models and data collection techniques to identify potential fraud cases. These techniques include:
- Rules-based models
- Anomaly models
- Predictive models
- Spatial analysis
- Network link analysis
Reducing Fraud and Maintaining Program Integrity
By using these advanced tools, GAWIC aims to reduce fraud and maintain the integrity of the program. For more detailed information on fraud allegations, investigations, and referrals by district, local agency participation, and experience, please refer to the evaluation framework provided.