Here is the converted article in markdown format:

Ghost Purchases Dominate Top Income Bracket in Ecuador

A shocking new study has revealed that ghost firms are overwhelmingly used by high-income individuals in Ecuador to evade taxes, exacerbating income inequality and undermining the country’s tax base.

Study Findings

Researchers at the University of [University Name] analyzed data from 2010 to 2020 and found that ghost firm activity is concentrated among top earners. The amount of additional tax reported as a share of owners’ income was 170 times higher in the top 1% than in the bottom 80% of the income distribution.

Progressive Implications

The study suggests that curbing the use of ghost firms could have significant progressive implications for taxation. “Ghosting the tax authority: Fake firms and tax fraud” was authored by [Author Names] and is a wake-up call for policymakers struggling to combat tax evasion in developing countries like Ecuador.

Methodology

The researchers used a novel approach, targeting ghost clients rather than the elusive ghost firms themselves, to identify fraudulent activities. They found that low- and middle-income countries rely disproportionately on tax revenues collected from firms, making organized evasion like ghost firm activity a significant threat to their revenue collection.

What are Ghost Firms?

Ghost firms are businesses that do not actually exist or operate but are used to generate fake invoices, expenses, and other financial records to avoid paying taxes. The phenomenon is particularly prevalent in developing countries where corruption and lack of effective tax enforcement create an environment conducive to tax evasion.

Policy Implications

The study’s findings have important implications for policymakers seeking to strengthen tax capacity and increase horizontal and vertical equity in taxation. As the authors note, “Since low- and middle-income countries rely disproportionately on tax revenues collected from firms, this form of organized evasion can make a big dent in their revenue collection.”

Targeting Ghost Clients

The article concludes that targeting ghost clients, rather than the elusive ghost firms themselves, shows promise for policymakers dealing with this challenging phenomenon.

References

[Insert references cited in the original article]

I hope this converted markdown format meets your requirements. Let me know if you have any further requests!