Japan’s Bold Strides in Combating Financial Crime: A Step Forward in Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Regulations
Japan, as a significant player in the global economy, has taken decisive measures to strengthen its financial crime prevention framework, focusing on money laundering and terrorist financing. These efforts have begun to yield results, according to the latest assessment by the Asia Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG) and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) in their mutual evaluation report on Japan’s Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorist Financing (AML/CFT) system 1.
Japan’s Advancement in AML/CFT System
Japan’s initiatives have moved the needle in the right direction. Some of the progress made is:
-
Legal and Regulatory Framework
-
Risk-Based Approach
-
International Cooperation
- Strengthened legal and institutional frameworks for international cooperation
- Adopted measures to establish mutual legal assistance agreements and information exchange channels 8
Areas for Improvement
Despite these accomplishments, the FATF and APG evaluations identified areas where Japan could improve 9:
-
Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)
-
Investigation and Prosecution
-
Technology and Data Analysis
Conclusion
By focusing on improving these areas, Japan can further solidify its position as a responsible global financial player. This will ensure its economy is shielded from potential risks and promote greater financial stability in the Asia Pacific region 19.
The FATF and APG mutual evaluation report serves as a valuable stepping stone for Japan to continue refining its AML/CFT framework, adhering to the highest international standards, and effectively combating financial crimes 20.
-
FATF and APG Assessment Reports, FATF, https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.1. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.3. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.6. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.9. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.15. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.17. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.34. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.48. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.50. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.51. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.52. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.63. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.65. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.66. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.68. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.69. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.69. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.75. ↩︎
-
FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.77. ↩︎