Financial Crime World

Japan’s Bold Strides in Combating Financial Crime: A Step Forward in Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Regulations

Japan, as a significant player in the global economy, has taken decisive measures to strengthen its financial crime prevention framework, focusing on money laundering and terrorist financing. These efforts have begun to yield results, according to the latest assessment by the Asia Pacific Group on Money Laundering (APG) and the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) in their mutual evaluation report on Japan’s Anti-Money Laundering and Counter Terrorist Financing (AML/CFT) system 1.

Japan’s Advancement in AML/CFT System

Japan’s initiatives have moved the needle in the right direction. Some of the progress made is:

  1. Legal and Regulatory Framework

    • Established a sound framework for financial crime prevention 2
    • Laws and regulations counter money laundering and terrorist financing 3
    • Committed to implementing the framework
    • Some additional measures required to address emerging risks 4
  2. Risk-Based Approach

    • Moving towards a risk-based approach 5
    • Prioritizes resources on high-risk sectors and activities
    • Significant improvements in implementing customer due diligence (CDD) measures 6
    • Enhanced national risk assessment to identify emerging threats 7
  3. International Cooperation

    • Strengthened legal and institutional frameworks for international cooperation
    • Adopted measures to establish mutual legal assistance agreements and information exchange channels 8

Areas for Improvement

Despite these accomplishments, the FATF and APG evaluations identified areas where Japan could improve 9:

  1. Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)

    • Effective in handling suspicious transaction reports (STRs) 10
    • Resource allocation and coordination with other stakeholders, particularly in the private sector 11 needs attention
    • Address these challenges to ensure timely and effective financial intelligence sharing 12
  2. Investigation and Prosecution

    • Effective investigation and prosecution of financial crimes 13
    • Enhance investigative capacity
    • Improve legal tools 14
    • Increase inter-agency cooperation 15
  3. Technology and Data Analysis

    • Embrace technology and data analysis 16
    • Implement more advanced monitoring tools, big data analytics, and machine learning 17
    • Identify emerging risks and patterns in financial transactions 18

Conclusion

By focusing on improving these areas, Japan can further solidify its position as a responsible global financial player. This will ensure its economy is shielded from potential risks and promote greater financial stability in the Asia Pacific region 19.

The FATF and APG mutual evaluation report serves as a valuable stepping stone for Japan to continue refining its AML/CFT framework, adhering to the highest international standards, and effectively combating financial crimes 20.


  1. FATF and APG Assessment Reports, FATF, https://www.fatf-gafi.org/en/↩︎

  2. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.1. ↩︎

  3. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.3. ↩︎

  4. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.6. ↩︎

  5. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.9. ↩︎

  6. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.15. ↩︎

  7. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.17. ↩︎

  8. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.34. ↩︎

  9. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.48. ↩︎

  10. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.50. ↩︎

  11. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.51. ↩︎

  12. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.52. ↩︎

  13. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.63. ↩︎

  14. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.65. ↩︎

  15. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.66. ↩︎

  16. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.68. ↩︎

  17. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.69. ↩︎

  18. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.69. ↩︎

  19. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.75. ↩︎

  20. FATF and APG Evaluation Report: Japan, APG, FATF, 2020, p.77. ↩︎