Japan Faces Scrutiny Over Anti-Money Laundering Laws
A recent report has highlighted concerns over Japan’s implementation of anti-money laundering (AML) laws, with the country failing to meet some of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) recommendations.
Overview of AML Compliance in Japan
The report assesses the extent to which countries have implemented FATF requirements. While Japan is largely compliant in several areas, including:
- Assessing risk and applying a risk-based approach
- National cooperation and coordination
- Money laundering offence
However, the country has been deemed partially compliant or non-compliant in other key areas.
Areas of Concern
Financial Institution Secrecy Laws
Japan’s financial institution secrecy laws were found to be partially compliant. The report raised concerns over:
- Lack of transparency
- Beneficial ownership of legal persons
Regulation and Supervision of DNFBPs
The regulation and supervision of designated non-financial businesses and professions (DNFBPs) were also deemed partially compliant.
Targeted Financial Sanctions Related to Terrorism and Terrorist Financing
Japan has been criticized for its lack of progress in implementing targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism and terrorist financing.
Guidance and Feedback on AML Matters
The country has failed to provide guidance and feedback on AML matters.
Mutual Legal Assistance Procedures
Japan’s mutual legal assistance procedures were found to be non-compliant.
Key Areas of Concern
- Financial institution secrecy laws: partially compliant
- Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs: partially compliant
- Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism and terrorist financing: non-compliant
- Guidance and feedback on AML matters: non-compliant
- Mutual legal assistance procedures: non-compliant
Recommendations for Improvement
The report recommends that Japan take the following steps to improve its AML framework:
- Strengthen Transparency and Beneficial Ownership Requirements: Enhance transparency and beneficial ownership requirements for financial institutions.
- Enhance Regulation and Supervision of DNFBPs: Improve regulation and supervision of DNFBPs to prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.
- Improve Guidance and Feedback on AML Matters: Provide clear guidance and feedback on AML matters to ensure effective implementation of AML laws.
- Implement Targeted Financial Sanctions Related to Terrorism and Terrorist Financing: Implement targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism and terrorist financing in accordance with FATF recommendations.
- Revise Mutual Legal Assistance Procedures: Revise mutual legal assistance procedures to comply with international standards.
By addressing these concerns, Japan can better meet international standards and prevent money laundering and terrorist financing.