Korea’s Anti-Money Laundering and Combating the Financing of Terrorism Efforts Under Scrutiny
Strengths and Weaknesses
A recent report has highlighted several areas where Korea’s anti-money laundering (AML) and combating the financing of terrorism (CFT) efforts could be improved. While Korea’s customer identification and verification processes are considered a strength, there are still some weaknesses that need to be addressed.
Customer Due Diligence (CDD)
- The reliability of Korea’s CDD process could be strengthened by requiring secondary verification of customer information.
- There is currently no provision in law or regulation requiring CDD for transactions below the designated threshold that appear to be linked.
Legal Framework
- Korea’s legal framework is strong, but there are limitations on the sharing of customer identification information between financial institutions.
- There is a lack of explicit requirements for record-keeping and transaction reporting.
- No requirement for financial institutions to pay special attention to complex or unusual transactions, or business relationships with individuals from countries that do not fully implement AML/CFT measures.
Suspicious Transaction Reporting (STR)
- Korea’s STR system has been praised as well-implemented.
- However, the low reporting threshold of KRW 20 million (approximately USD 17,000) may undermine its effectiveness.
- Deficiencies in the list of predicate offenses and TF offenses impact on the scope of the STR requirement.
Conclusion
While Korea has made progress in implementing AML/CFT measures, there are still areas for improvement. These include:
- The need for more specific requirements for internal controls and employee training.
- Greater oversight of foreign branches and subsidiaries.
By addressing these weaknesses, Korea can further strengthen its anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism efforts.