Financial Crime World

Romania’s Asset Recovery Efforts: Room for Improvement

=====================================================

A recent study has shed light on several areas where Romania’s authorities can enhance their efforts to confiscate and recover proceeds of crime. This report highlights the challenges faced by Romanian agencies in recovering assets and provides recommendations for improvement.

Poor Information Management Policies

The study found that Romanian agencies struggle with poor information management policies, making it difficult to track assets that have been frozen or seized. This lack of transparency hinders the allocation of resources at a system-wide level and prevents the assessment of risks and trends within the administration.

Key Challenges:

  • Poor data management systems
  • Limited access to information on seized assets
  • Inefficient tracking of frozen assets

Lack of Centralized Unit for Communication with Foreign Jurisdictions

The report also found that there is no centralized unit responsible for communicating with foreign jurisdictions, leading to a cumbersome process of requesting information from multiple bodies. To address this issue:

Recommendations:

  • Establish a centralized unit for communication with foreign jurisdictions
  • Provide law enforcement and prosecutorial bodies with access to non-confidential information, such as land registry data

Importance of Proactive Information Sharing

The study emphasizes the importance of proactive information sharing between stakeholders at a system-wide level. This includes sharing information in a timely manner, taking into account the sensitivities of criminal investigations and seizures.

Best Practices:

  • Share information in a timely and efficient manner
  • Consider the sensitivities of criminal investigations and seizures when sharing information

Lack of Financial Investigative Capacities

The report highlights the lack of financial investigative capacities within Romania’s criminal investigation bodies. To address this issue:

Recommendations:

  • Establish a body of financial investigators
  • Integrate financial profiling into every criminal investigation relating to serious or organized crime

Clarification of Responsibility for Managing Seized Assets

The study found that the management of seized assets is dispersed across multiple courts and prosecutors, leading to inefficiencies and costs. To address this issue:

Recommendations:

  • Clarify responsibility for managing seized assets
  • Establish a centralized unit for managing seized assets

Methodology and Conclusion

The report’s methodology involved a desktop study, on-site data collection, and analysis, as well as a benchmarking exercise with European standards. The findings and recommendations were subject to discussion and validation through a back-and-forth process.

Conclusion:

Romania’s asset recovery regime has significant room for improvement, particularly in terms of information management, financial investigative capacities, and the management of seized assets. Addressing these issues will be crucial to enhancing the country’s efforts to combat economic and financial crimes.