Financial Institution Risk Management in Nepal Faces Challenges

======================================================

The Asian Development Bank (ADB) has identified various risks that could impact the financial institution risk management in Nepal. These risks include public fiscal management, procurement, governance, technical, labor union, social, and environmental risks.

Public Fiscal Management Risks

According to a report by the ADB, the government of Nepal has a satisfactory legal and regulatory system for fiscal management. However, implementation and enforcement issues have been identified. To mitigate this risk, the program management unit will ensure that it keeps separate records and accounts for the imprest fund and project expenditures in accordance with sound accounting principles.

Procurement Risks

The report highlights procurement risks due to the government’s limited capacity and knowledge of procurement procedures. To address this issue, project personnel will receive intensive training on ADB’s procurement guidelines, and a national consultant will be placed at the executing agency to guide and supervise project procurement.

Governance Risks

Governance is another area of concern, with corruption being a major challenge in Nepal. However, the government has taken several initiatives to address corruption, including the establishment of institutions such as the Credit Information Bureau and the Debt Recovery Tribunal. The ADB report notes that these efforts will help improve governance and reduce corruption risks.

Technical Capacity Risks

The report identifies technical capacity as a risk, citing the need for staff at participating financial institutions to receive comprehensive training in banking and financial subjects. Additionally, the National Banking Training Institute will facilitate short-, medium-, and longer-terme training for practitioners in various fields of banking and financial expertise.

Labor Union Risks

Labor unions are another area of concern, with four labor unions at ADBL potentially opposing some of the proposed restructuring activities. However, the report notes that extensive consultations were held with the unions during the preparation of subprogram 2, and general support was received from the unions.

Social risks include concerns about the impact on poor and disadvantaged groups, who may be left out as financial institutions focus on cost-efficiency and profitability. However, the report highlights institutional reform efforts aimed at making financial services more inclusive.

Environmental Risks

Finally, environmental risks are considered low due to the absence of any negative environmental impacts expected from the subprogram.

Conclusion

The ADB report concludes that Nepal’s financial institution risk management faces several challenges. However, these can be mitigated through effective implementation of reforms and capacity building.