Here is the rewritten article in Markdown format:
Russian Federation’s Financial Regulation and Governance: Evolution and Challenges
The Russian financial sector has undergone significant changes since the country transitioned to a market-based economy in the late 1980s. The regulatory framework has evolved through two distinct stages, with the Bank of Russia taking on the role of mega-regulator in 2013.
First Stage: Fragmentation and Inconsistencies (1989-2013)
During this period, multiple regulatory bodies coexisted, leading to inconsistencies and inefficiencies. This was marked by a series of attempts to reform the regulatory framework, but ultimately failed to produce a cohesive system.
Second Stage: Consolidation and Coherence (2013-Present)
In contrast, the second stage has seen the Bank of Russia assume responsibility for regulating all financial sectors, including banking, microfinance, and debt collection. While this consolidation has brought greater coherence and consistency to the regulatory landscape, it has also raised concerns about the concentration of power and potential conflicts of interest.
Factors Influencing Self-Regulation
The success or failure of self-regulation in these sectors can be attributed to various factors, including:
- Level of Transparency: The extent to which financial institutions are transparent in their operations and reporting.
- Accountability: The degree to which regulators hold financial institutions accountable for their actions.
- Communication: The level of communication between regulators, market participants, and consumers.
Banking Sector Progress
The banking sector has made significant progress in recent years, with increased transparency and improved risk management practices.
Challenges in Microfinance and Debt Collection
However, other sectors, such as microfinance and debt collection, have faced challenges in establishing effective self-regulatory mechanisms. Factors contributing to these difficulties include:
- Lack of Resources: Insufficient funding and resources to implement regulatory measures.
- Inadequate Infrastructure: Limited infrastructure to support regulatory activities.
- Limited Consumer Awareness: Low levels of awareness among consumers about financial products and services.
Conclusion
The Russian financial sector has made significant strides in recent years, with the Bank of Russia playing a key role in shaping the regulatory landscape. While there are still challenges to be addressed, the consolidation of regulatory powers under one body is a step in the right direction towards creating a more cohesive and effective system.
References
- Buklemishev O, Danilov Y (2013) Effective financial regulation and creation of the mega-regulator in Russia. J New Econ Assoc 19(3):82–98
- Ezangina IA, Evstratov AV, Jovanovic TG (2016) Challenges and perspectives for development of banking credit infrastructure in Russia. Int J Econ Financ Issues 6(2S):58–64
- Farvaque E, Refait-Alexandre C, Weill L (2012) Are transparent banks more efficient? Evidence from Russia. East Eur Econ 50(4):60–77
- Ferran E, Moloney N, Hill JG, Coffee JC Jr (2012) The regulatory aftermath of the global financial crisis. Cambridge University Press, New York
- Friedman J, Kraus W (2011) Engineering the financial crisis: systemic risk and the failure of regulation. University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia
- Grekova I (2019) Optimization of Regulatory Load. A report at the XV International Forum of National Financial Association, December 3, 2018, Moscow
- Inderst R (2009) Retail finance: a regulatory challenge. Journal of Banking and Finance 33(11):2390–2401
- San-Jose L, Retolaza J, van Liedekerke L (2020) Handbook on Ethics in Finance. Springer, Cham
- Storchevoy M, Grekova I (2020) Regulation of Financial Conduct in Russia. In: San-Jose L, Retolaza J, van Liedekerke L (eds) Handbook on Ethics in Finance. International Handbooks in Business Ethics. Springer, Cham.