Title: Serbia and Montenegro: Addressing the Challenges in AML/CFT Regulations
MONEYVAL’s Assessment of Serbia and Montenegro’s AML/CFT Frameworks
- Strasbourg, 21st January 2005 - MONEYVAL’s latest ROSC report for FATF Recommendations Against Money Laundering and the 8 Special Recommendations for Combating the Financing of Terrorism
- Evaluation primarily focuses on legislative and regulatory frameworks, criminal justice measures, and financial institutions
- Highlights several significant gaps in Serbia and Montenegro’s AML/CFT regime
Complex Legal Landscape in Serbia and Montenegro
- Separate governments and parliaments, but also federal parliament
- Divided regulatory frameworks due to the overlapping of powers
Challenges in Serbia
- Absence of provisions for confiscation and seizure of funds related to terrorist financing
- Weakening of legal tools for combating money laundering and terrorist financing
Challenges in Montenegro
- Absence of a Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU)
- Essential for coordinating AML/CFT efforts
- Montenegro lacks specific legislation on financing terrorism
- Lack of specific provisions for criminalizing financing of terrorism
Progress Towards Improvement
- Serbian FIU’s membership in the Egmont Group
- Montenegro’s establishment of an FIU
Importance of Addressing Identified Gaps
- Strengthening AML/CFT frameworks
- Improving capabilities to combat money laundering and terrorist financing
Serbia: Insufficient Confiscation and Seizure Provisions
- Evaluators identified the absence of specific provisions on confiscating the proceeds of terrorist financing and seizing money intended for it
- Weakens Serbia’s legal tools for combating money laundering and terrorist financing effectively
Montenegro: Absence of a Financial Intelligence Unit
- Lack of a functional Financial Intelligence Unit (FIU) as a major concern
- Montenegro has no specific legislation on financing terrorism, impeding Serbia’s efforts to combat money laundering and terrorist financing in the region
Criminalisation of Money Laundering and Financing of Terrorism
- Both Serbia and Montenegro’s legislative frameworks lack specific provisions for the criminalisation of financing terrorism
- While money laundering is criminalised, the absence of explicit references to financing terrorism hinders their efforts to address this issue effectively