Sudan’s Justice Institutions Must Take Ownership of Conflict Resolution

The United Nations Security Council has stressed the significance of national justice institutions taking ownership of conflict resolution in Sudan, rather than relying on external interference. This emphasis was highlighted during a recent discussion on the situation in Darfur and the role of the International Criminal Court (ICC) in investigating human rights violations.

The Role of the African Union

The African Union was recognized as a key player in efforts to stabilize Sudan, with the potential to secure a fair and transparent accountability process. However, several council members expressed concerns over foreign interference in the conflict, with some rejecting the ICC’s involvement altogether.

Concerns Over Foreign Interference

Russia’s representative condemned the ICC’s actions, accusing it of sabotaging the mandates of the Security Council and causing harm. She highlighted Libya’s statehood being destroyed under the guise of “fake” evidence presented by the court.

On the other hand, France called on all parties to cooperate with the ICC and welcomed efforts by the Prosecutor’s Office to investigate human rights violations in Sudan. However, Sudan’s representative emphasized that his country is actively cooperating with the Prosecutor’s Office and rejecting allegations of atrocities committed by its armed forces.

The Situation in Darfur

The situation in Darfur was described as “the worst ever” by a council member, with widespread displacement and suffering. The need for justice and accountability was underscored, with some calling for a new dynamic approach to ensure that the voices of victims are heard.

Sudan’s Perspective

In his remarks, Sudan’s representative detailed attacks by the Rapid Support Forces and its allied militias, including the recruitment of children and use of foreign mercenaries. He also emphasized the need for self-defense in the face of multilateral aggression sponsored by some countries.

Criticisms of the ICC Prosecutor

The ICC Prosecutor was criticized for demanding more documents from Sudan without considering strategic engagement and operational realities on the ground. The representative of Sudan stressed that his country’s current regime is different from that of 2003, with active cooperation with the Prosecutor’s Office.

Conclusion

Overall, the council emphasized the need for national justice institutions to take ownership of conflict resolution in Sudan, while also highlighting the importance of international cooperation and accountability.