Here is the rewritten article in Markdown format:

Suriname’s Financial Crime Definition Under Scrutiny

As part of its efforts to combat financial crime, Suriname has undergone an assessment by global authorities. The results have been mixed, with some areas showing significant compliance and others falling short.

Implementation of FATF Recommendations

According to the latest report, Suriname received ratings for its implementation of the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) Recommendations. These recommendations provide a framework for countries to prevent and combat financial crime.

Here are the key areas where Suriname scored highest:

Assessing risk and applying a risk-based approach
National cooperation and coordination
Money laundering offence
Confiscation and provisional measures
Targeted financial sanctions related to terrorism and terrorist financing
Correspondent banking

However, Suriname fell short in other areas. It was deemed non-compliant with regards to:

Transparency and beneficial ownership of legal persons and arrangements
Regulation and supervision of DNFBPs (Designated Non-Financial Businesses and Professions)

Additionally, it received partial compliance ratings for:

Confiscation and provisional measures
Terrorist financing offence
Money or value transfer services

Areas for Improvement

The report also highlighted some areas where Suriname needs improvement. These include:

Implementing effective customer due diligence
Maintaining accurate records
Ensuring the reliability of third parties

Strengthening Laws and Regulations

Suriname’s financial crime definition is a critical component in the country’s efforts to combat money laundering and terrorist financing. The government has committed to strengthening its laws and regulations to prevent these crimes from occurring.

Full Report Available

The full report can be accessed on the FATF website. It provides a detailed breakdown of Suriname’s compliance with the Recommendations and areas where improvement is needed.